The Spectrum Journal TSJ 3107-5738 Mr. Chanderprakash Mittal 10.64790/tsj.2025.v1.i2.20 spectrum-00000020 To compare short term visual and anatomical outcomes of single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (4 mg/0.1 ml) versus single intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 ml) in diabetic macular edema at the end of one month Deshmukh Tejal Pundalik Sadalge Aditya Vipul Malviya Arundhati Patil Shruti Subhash Parikh Komal Satish NAMO medical hospital and research center silvasa, India Central Railway Hospital, Byculla, Mumbai 2026 1 2 2 7 This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons license.

Purpose: To compare the short-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) versus intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in the management of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: A randomized, comparative, interventional study was conducted on 40 eyes of patients with DME, divided equally into two groups (n=20 each). Group 1 received 1.25 mg/0.05 mL IVB, while Group 2 received 4 mg/0.1 mL IVTA. Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, duration of diabetes, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central macular thickness (CMT), were comparable between the groups. BCVA (logMAR) and CMT were assessed at baseline and at 1 month post-injection. Results: At 1 month, both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement in BCVA and CMT compared to baseline (p Conclusion: A single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide produces superior short-term improvements in visual acuity and macular thickness compared to bevacizumab in patients with DME. However, the associated risk of IOP elevation with IVTA requires careful post-injection monitoring.